
Apadmi
Apadmi Alternatives
Profile Overview
Feedbax Awards
Service providers ranking among the top 20 in our directories are awarded our Top Vendor recognition for the respective directory.
About Apadmi
Apadmi creates, builds, and refines mobile applications for well-known brands. By bringing together product strategy, modern platforms, middleware, and seamless systems integrations, we help organizations evolve the way they operate and add measurable new value. With a team of more than 450 in-house specialists, Apadmi partners with clients to shape their digital direction, craft user experiences, and engineer breakthrough products. From Domino’s and Co-op to the NHS, Chetwood, Argos, Asda, Sykes Cottages, Charles Stanley, BBC, SailGP, Wattbike, and Chelsea Football Club, our work tackles real business challenges for leading names.
Contact the vendor and get feedback on your queries in a timely manner.
Locations
Services
- App Development: 35 %
- Augmented Reality Virtual Reality: 20 %
- Web Development: 25 %
- Video Production: 20 %
CMS & Website Builder
- DotNetNuke: 100%
Frameworks
Application Platforms
- Amazon: 29%
- Linux Server: 14%
- Azure: 29%
- A-Frame: 14%
- ARmedia: 14%
Programming & Scripting
- C Plus Plus (C++): 17%
- .NET : 17 %
- AJAX: 15%
- Python : 17 %
- Vue.js : 17 %
- Progressive Web Apps : 17 %
App Focus
- Finance Apps : 25 %
- Enterprise Apps : 25 %
- Health & Sport: 25%
- Productivity: 25%
Contact the service provider and receive an appropriate offer in a timely manner.
Portfolio
Projects

Domino's App
Case Study by Apadmi
Contact the service provider and receive an appropriate offer in a timely manner.
Further case studies of the provider
Contact the service provider and receive an appropriate offer in a timely manner.
Rating Overview
Overall Rating
Rating distribution
| RATING | PERCENTAGE | DISTRIBUTION |
|---|---|---|
| 5 stars | 70% | |
| 4 stars | 20% | |
| 3 stars | 0% | |
| 2 stars | 0% | |
| 1 star | 10% |
reviews
Feedbax reviews
All Reviews
Issue resolved (my mistake), and the suggestions were taken to heart.
This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.
Short version: Use their Waterkaarten app only if you don’t mind taking damage to your boat, because the map is full of serious, glaring errors. Long version: The ANWB handed over the release of the digital water map to this company—but it’s clear they’ve really bungled it. During an initial check, I found multiple mistakes of varying severity. The worst errors can leave you with major damage to your vessel, or force you to hire an expensive salvage operation. It starts with a waterway in Friesland. According to the map, it’s more than 7 meters deep, which is already highly unlikely. But the locks are only 2 meters deep, so you might think you can safely pass there with, say, a 1.7-meter-draft boat. Wrong. If you do, you’ll get stuck for sure, and your boat will need to be lifted with a crane onto a deep-transport trailer. That waterway has recently been dredged to a depth of 1.5 meters, which is why the permitted draft is 1.3 meters. And that’s just one example—there are more places where the stated draft is wrong. It also gets the height of bridges wrong. On the map, on a busy waterway in South Holland, there’s a bridge drawn with a clearance of 2.45 meters. In reality, it’s tight at about 2.35 meters. And they’ve listed incorrect bridge heights in more places as well. But I also found a waterway (where commercial shipping even comes through) where they don’t seem to know a bridge exists—despite it having been there since 2009! Will The Mobile Company reimburse you if you suffer damage because of their mistakes? No—don’t count on it. They’ve almost certainly covered themselves. And there are smaller errors too. For example, the Waterkaarten app is basically useless if you’re looking for a place to moor. Apparently, a structure like the lock or bridge gate is treated as a mooring option—or a spot where only commercial vessels are allowed. But they’ve also invented a variety of “mooring locations” where there’s absolutely nothing to be found—not nearby, and possibly not ever. On top of that, in multiple places they don’t know (or don’t provide) operating hours, docking costs, the tourist tax—or anything else you might need. Yes, you can submit improvements to them. That’s a clever idea: you pay for an app, and then you end up having to supply the information for free and/or correct the mistakes. And the risk? That’s entirely on you. So this app serves no purpose at all. Even if it were free, I’d still recommend against it because of the major errors it contains.
Great company, Waterkaarten.
I was on the meetup and it was lovely. Good company, nice food and great views!





