Smart Solutions. Simple Delivery.

CodeIQ

Smart Solutions. Simple Delivery.

CodeIQ Alternatives

Vention
4.9
1,001-5,000
New York

Software Development
App Development
Web Development
Blockchain & Web3

Profile Overview

Minimum Budget
> €25,000
Hour Rate
€100 - €149
Company Size
2-10
Founding Year
2017

About CodeIQ

Rating Overview

Overall Rating

4.3
12 reviews

Rating distribution

  • 5 stars 78.6%
  • 4 stars 0%
  • 3 stars 0%
  • 2 stars 0%
  • 1 star 21.4%
Have you already worked with this provider? Leave a Review

Reviews

Feedbax reviews

Have you already worked with this provider?

All Reviews


1.0

This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.

Would you like to read this review? Register now for free and read all customer reviews without restrictions.

DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THEM UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, Very bad experience with Serge Huijsen / SHWEB B.V. / CodelQ, Formal police report

My advice to other business owners is clear: think very carefully before doing business with this company. My experience with Serge Huijsen, SHWEB B.V. and CodelQ has been extremely negative and has now resulted in a legal dispute.

Serge Huijsen was supposed to develop a professional, fully functional website for me, including specifically agreed AI features. He explicitly confirmed to me that these features had been completed and implemented.

However, throughout the project I experienced ongoing technical problems and very difficult communication. I repeatedly had to ask for progress updates myself and check features that I could reasonably have expected to be professionally tested before delivery.

I therefore engaged an external technical expert. According to their investigation, the website had significant shortcomings and the agreed AI features were missing. This directly contradicted the confirmations I had received earlier.

I subsequently formally placed Serge Huijsen in default, terminated the agreement and demanded a full refund. To date, I have not received a full refund. I stand by my claim and await further legal proceedings.

I also find SHWEB B.V. / CodelQ’s public response to my earlier review elsewhere disappointing. It disputes my experiences and the findings of the investigation. Among other things, it refers to GitHub and the external expert’s position. In my opinion, those references do not, in themselves, refute the technical findings. Ultimately, what matters to me is whether the agreed final product actually works properly.

Because of my serious concerns about how matters were handled, I formally filed a report with the police in Amersfoort. It is for the competent authorities to determine whether there are grounds for a criminal investigation. I am not making any statement here about possible criminal liability.

In addition, work is underway on a civil summons so that the dispute and my refund claim can be assessed legally.

I am regularly contacted by people with questions about my experiences. Anyone who wants to know more can find me by my first and last name or through Soso Lobi B.V. I am willing to explain my personal experiences.

My conclusion: An extremely bad experience. My trust in this company has completely disappeared. In my opinion, a professional web developer should be judged on the quality and performance of the agreed final product, not solely on promises or recorded development activities.


Comment by CodeIQ

We note that Mr Marchano Wilsterman has once again published an extensive post about our company and our director, Serge Huijsen. This time, he has expanded his earlier account with references to a police report and an announced civil proceeding.

We believe it is necessary to respond. Not because we wish to publicly challenge every negative customer experience, but because a one-sided account has now been published repeatedly, and we strongly dispute it on essential points.

We expressly dispute the suggestion that the agreed features, including the AI features, were not delivered.

Work was in fact carried out during the development project. The technical development, changes and implementations were also recorded in GitHub. The complete development history can therefore be reviewed and taken into account in an objective assessment of the dispute.

It is therefore incorrect to dismiss the technical work outright as obligations that were not performed.

Mr Wilsterman refers to an external expert he engaged and presents that expert’s findings as evidence of deficiencies.

We dispute the conclusions of this investigation. A technical report commissioned by one party is not automatically an independent or legally binding determination. The assessment must take into account the methodology, original specifications, technical baseline and the work actually performed.

To our knowledge, the position of the expert in the same commercial market is also relevant when assessing their independence.

We have no objection to a substantive assessment by a genuinely independent expert.

A notice of default, a termination notice or a refund request initially represents the position of the person issuing it.

That does not automatically mean that an agreement has been validly terminated, that there has been an attributable breach, or that the amounts claimed are payable.

The parties clearly disagree on these matters. We do not accept that one party’s legal position should be presented as though it has already been objectively established.

We find the addition concerning a formal police report particularly striking.

A police report is not proof of criminal conduct, a finding of guilt or a court ruling. It is a report made by a complainant, the contents and any criminal relevance of which must be assessed by the competent authorities.

Emphasising this in a public review may suggest to readers that criminal misconduct has occurred. We expressly reject any suggestion that criminal guilt has already been established.

What concerns us now is the repetition. The same business dispute is being published again, expanded and accompanied by additional legal insinuations.

Everyone has the right to share a negative experience. We respect that. However, this right does not mean that a one-sided account of a disputed matter can be presented indefinitely as an established set of facts.

The posts name not only our company but also our director personally. This affects our professional reputation, employees, clients and business relationships.

We take this seriously and expressly reserve all rights and defenses with regard to any unlawful publications and any resulting damages.

We will not disclose confidential customer information to win an online argument. The substantive assessment belongs where it should: with independent experts and, if necessary, the competent court.

Google

5.0

We hebben een super professioneel website laten bouwen en onze backend volledig op maat laten inrichten.

Google

5.0

I couldn’t be more satisfied with my collaboration with CodeIQ B.V. They’ve helped me outstandingly across multiple projects, including the development of websites, applications, and various integrations. The team actively thinks along with you, works professionally, and delivers high-quality work. Communication is smooth, and commitments are consistently met. Thanks to their expertise, my projects have been completed successfully. I would absolutely recommend them to anyone looking for a reliable IT partner that delivers high-end products with passion.

Google

1.0

This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.

Would you like to read this review? Register now for free and read all customer reviews without restrictions.

ABSOLUUT NIET MET DEZE PARTIJ IN ZEE, zeer slechte ervaring met Serge Huijsen / SHWEB B.V. / CodelQ

Mijn advies is heel duidelijk: ga absoluut niet met deze partij in zee. Mijn ervaring met Serge Huijsen, SHWEB B.V., inmiddels actief onder de naam CodelQ, is ronduit slecht.

Serge Huijsen zou voor mij een complete en professioneel werkende website ontwikkelen. Een belangrijk onderdeel van de opdracht was bovendien de implementatie van AI-functionaliteiten. Serge Huijsen heeft tegenover mij bevestigd dat deze AI-implementaties aanwezig waren en ook waren uitgevoerd.

Omdat er steeds meer problemen aan het licht kwamen, heb ik uiteindelijk een externe partij ingeschakeld om de website en het geleverde werk technisch te onderzoeken. Volgens die externe partij bleken de toegezegde AI-implementaties helemaal niet aanwezig te zijn, terwijl Serge Huijsen tegenover mij wél had bevestigd dat deze waren geïmplementeerd.

Voor mij voelt dit als misleiding en oplichting. Ik heb betaald voor een opdracht waarbij functionaliteiten expliciet waren afgesproken en waarvan mij werd verteld dat ze gerealiseerd waren, maar uit het externe onderzoek kwam volgens mij iets heel anders naar voren.

Daarnaast is de communicatie met Serge Huijsen echt heel slecht geweest. Ik moest steeds zelf achter dingen aan. Tot mijn verbazing moest ik zelfs onderdelen en functionaliteiten van de website zelf gaan testen. Van een professionele webontwikkelaar mag je verwachten dat een website vóór oplevering behoorlijk wordt getest en dat essentiële functionaliteiten gewoon werken.

Naar mijn ervaring is de website in alle opzichten niet goed werkend opgeleverd. Het gaat niet om een paar kleine foutjes of cosmetische zaken, maar om fundamentele problemen waardoor de website in de praktijk niet naar behoren gebruikt kan worden.

Daarna heb ik Serge Huijsen formeel in gebreke gesteld en hem de kans gegeven om alsnog met een oplossing te komen. Zelfs na de ingebrekestelling kwam er geen passende inhoudelijke reactie.

De externe partij die ik daarna heb ingeschakeld, kwam ook tot de conclusie dat de website zeer slecht is opgeleverd en dat hij in de huidige staat niet werkbaar is. Daarbij bleek bovendien dat de afgesproken AI-implementaties volgens hun onderzoek ontbraken.

Voor mij is de maat vol. De kwestie loopt inmiddels juridisch door en Serge Huijsen zal binnenkort een dagvaarding ontvangen.

Mijn waarschuwing aan andere ondernemers is dan ook ondubbelzinnig:

GA ABSOLUUT NIET MET DEZE PARTIJ IN ZEE.

Mijn ervaring met Serge Huijsen / SHWEB B.V. / CodelQ is dat afspraken niet zijn nagekomen, toegezegde functionaliteiten ontbreken volgens extern onderzoek, de opgeleverde website niet werkbaar is en zelfs na een formele ingebrekestelling passende communicatie uitblijft.

Op basis van mijn ervaring kan ik niet anders dan mensen heel nadrukkelijk waarschuwen voor deze partij.


Comment by CodeIQ

It’s a pity that you’ve decided to read this experience—and especially this way of presenting the project trajectory—in this manner. We don’t recognize ourselves at all in that.

Throughout the entire development process, this website was worked on extensively. Hundreds of hours were invested in its development. Not only was what had originally been included in the offer and the agreements delivered, but additional functionality was also developed and delivered during the course of the project. A significant portion of that was provided without any additional costs and was outside the original offer.

We also don’t recognize the claim that the website wouldn’t be workable. The website was delivered and was used and tested during the project. Of course, as with any large-scale software project, there were points that had to be discussed, adjusted, or further developed. However, that doesn’t mean the website was “unworkable in all respects.”

We would also like to set the record straight regarding communication. On our side, we tried on multiple occasions to get in touch and to ask questions in order to reach a substantive solution. We received no further substantive response to those attempts to contact us. For that reason, we believe the impression that there was no willingness on our side to work toward a solution is not an accurate reflection of how things unfolded.

As for the AI functionalities, these were also part of the development process and actual work was carried out for them. That’s why we can’t agree with the general conclusion that these “are completely not present.”

Since the matter is now being handled through legal channels, we will not go into all the individual technical and contractual points in more detail via a public review. Naturally, we will substantiate them through the appropriate legal route, with the relevant agreements, communications, and work performed.

We find it unfortunate that the cooperation has ultimately ended in this way. At the same time, we believe it’s important that potential customers know that the picture presented in this review does not match our records and our side of the story.

Google

5.0

Google

1.0

This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.

Would you like to read this review? Register now for free and read all customer reviews without restrictions.

Very disappointing experience. After missed deadlines, poor communication, and empty promises, I ended the collaboration. I did receive a credit note, but my deposit still hasn’t been refunded. This company has proved to be unreliable to me, and I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone.

Google

5.0

I need a booking system for my website. They helped me incredibly fast and immediately understood what I was trying to do. Quick work, and high quality. Great prices too. I know who I’ll be calling again the next time I need something.


Comment by CodeIQ

Super tof project, Lucas—thanks for the trust!

Google

5.0

We were able to move to Shopify quickly and without any worries.

We’re really happy that we got in touch with SH web. Personal contact with Serge. The service and response time are excellent—going above and beyond our expectations. We’re genuinely very happy with the help we received. Highly recommended—10+++.

Kind regards, Kitty and Chantal from the Geurzussies


Comment by CodeIQ

Thank you so much for your lovely review, Kitty and Chantal. It’s been so great working with you!

Google

5.0

SHWEB provides excellent service and a professional approach. They definitely exceeded my expectations with the project they delivered.


Comment by CodeIQ

Thanks for your review!

Google

5.0

Great webshop setup, and excellent service!


Comment by CodeIQ

Thanks for your review, Birnaz!

Google

Services

Please note: The assignment of these data is based on estimates by Feedbax. These benefits are subject to change at any time at the discretion of the provider once it has adopted this company profile.

Please note: The assignment of these data is based on estimates by Feedbax. These benefits are subject to change at any time at the discretion of the provider once it has adopted this company profile.

Locations

Rotterdam

314 Hoge Filterweg 3063 KG Rotterdam (NL)
Contact Us
Analyze profile with AI
Logo