
Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft
Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft Alternatives
Profile Overview
About Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft
The INSM wants to renew Ludwig Erhard's regulatory principles and adapt them to globalization and demographic change.
Locations
Services
- Public Relations: 100 %
Rating Overview
Overall Rating
Distribution of rating stars
| STARS | PERCENTAGE | DISTRIBUTION |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Stars | 18.9% | |
| 4 Stars | 0% | |
| 3 Stars | 0% | |
| 2 Stars | 2.7% | |
| 1 Star | 78.4% |
Reviews
Feedbax Reviews
All Reviews
This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.
An employers' lobby group that claims to take criticism seriously, but then deletes its social media account because the questions were getting a little too close to the truth. Dear INSM... I have screenshots. ;-)
This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.
The INSM presents itself as a neutral voice in public debate, but functions far more like a polished lobbying machine with a very narrow ideological agenda. The branding suggests civic education; the output consistently serves employer interests. That mismatch alone would justify scepticism, but the real problem lies in the communication culture. The organisation frequently uses selective outrage, loudly amplifying issues that suit its worldview while remaining silent on equally pressing crises that do not. This is not public discourse, it’s agenda-shaping. INSM campaigns are highly professional, but that professionalism often masks astroturfing tendencies. Lobby messaging is packaged as if it were grassroots concern. In a democratic society, this lack of transparency is not a minor flaw; it’s a structural one. The tone of INSM spokespeople, especially in public dialogues, adds to the issue. Criticism is met with evasiveness, shifting goalposts, or personalised deflection rather than honest engagement. When confronted with inconsistencies in their own moral framing, representatives often retreat behind semantics instead of accountability.
Böhmermann hates this initiative. So it must be good 👍
If you read most of these reviews, then you know how much - or unfortunately rather: how little - many people think of freedom of opinion. It is interesting that INSM is defamed as a "lobby organization", while many of the so-called democracy promoters à la Campact, Attac, Correctiv, Omas gegen Rechts, etc., who do the same, escape the same kind of defamation. All the more so as INSM is NOT financed, not even partially, by taxpayers' money. Things are not looking good for the open exchange of opinions in Germany.
